IT’S official, Australians will be back on the streets on September 13th, including on Sydney’s iconic Harbour Bridge – and the establishment is panicking, even considering legislation contrary to a recent Supreme Court ruling allowing marches on the bridge.
The ABC immediately branded the planned protest as being “linked to anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists and sovereign citizens” and then went on to claim police were being tested over their ability to keep the landmark open.
“Police said the demonstration, scheduled for September 13, was being organised by an umbrella group known as Australia Unites Against Government Corruption. Other listed organisers include MMAMV Australia, whose Facebook page campaigns against “big pharma” and seeks to help children access “unvaccinated breastmilk”,” the ABC reported.
The protest organisers encourage people to join a “peaceful protest” and deliver a vote of “no confidence”. “Trust is gone, authority has cracked, and survival is hanging by a thread,” the website said.
“Even if the leader scrapes through, the writing is on the wall — their power has slipped, their backing has fractured, and the countdown to change has already begun.”
What the ABC didn’t and won’t be talking about, is the deep pedophile corruption inside Australia’s ruling elites as recorded in an ABC radio program back in 1975. A panel of pedophiles, hosted by leftist icon and confessed pedophile Richard Neville, used to program to justify pedastry as being separate and distinct form pedophilia.
The ABC is covering up the existence of the program but Martin North and John Adams of IOTP (In The Interests of the People) have obtained a copy upon which the ABC has imposed legal restrictions for private use only.
In a statement, the organisers said the September 13th rally would coincide with similar demonstrations around Australia, “reminding those who have taken power that something must change in the way this country is being led and run”.
They said speakers from Sunday’s March for Australia rallies would not be invited. Last Sunday’s March had a dark shadow cast over it when NSN members in Melbourne got into a brawl with Avi Yemeni’s security guards and then went on to attack an Aboriginal sacred site in a city park.
Under questioning by Liberal MP Susan Carter, senior police told a parliamentary budget estimates hearing that they had been notified about the protest, but gave no details about its planned route, duration, or potential impact on traffic.
Protest organisers have told the ABC they plan to march from Bradfield Park at Milsons Point, across the Harbour Bridge to Hyde Park, where speakers will address the audience.
They said they were “working cooperatively” with police and were expecting approximately 10,000 attendees.
In a statement cited by the ABC, police said they were “aware of a proposed planned assembly in Sydney on Saturday 13 September 2025” and “officers from North West Metropolitan Region have received a Form 1 and are consulting relevant stakeholders.”
The Form 1 is a notification to police about a planned public assembly. If police agree, protesters can be given protection from prosecution on certain summary offences, such as obstructing traffic.
If police oppose the demonstration, the protest is not deemed illegal, but participants don’t have the same protections if they break the law, the ABC noted hopefully.
“After trying — and failing — to stop August’s massive pro-Palestinian demonstration on the bridge, police now face the prospect of another Supreme Court showdown, should they oppose the Form 1.
“Last month, after the pro-Palestinian demonstration went ahead, Premier Chris Minns warned people against thinking it was “open season” on the bridge.
“We’re not going to have a situation where an anti-vaccine group has it one Saturday … then the weekend after that we have an environmental cause, and then the weekend after that … an industrial dispute.”
He said he feared the Supreme Court’s decision may have set a precedent, making it easier for other groups to stage protests on the famous landmark. Minns didn’t rule out introducing legislation to prevent that from occurring.
Then, a few weeks later, he told parliament he’d received advice that such a move could “go close” to being unconstitutional.
“I didn’t want to have the situation, given the volatility of the circumstances, where I committed to introducing legislation that then gets knocked over in the High Court,” he said.
However, he said he didn’t believe the government was “completely hamstrung” and he was still considering his options.
Joel Jammal from Turning Point Australia found it amusing that only now, after two years of pro-Palestinian protest, authorities were becoming concerned about use of police resources.
