Why are American schools separating children by race in classrooms?

The rupture is sanctioned. The betrayal is bureaucratic. Across classrooms in America, children are being separated by race, not metaphorically, not historically, but administratively. The language is soft. The impact is brutal.

“Over 100 districts in 26 states and Washington, D.C., have offered employees identity-based affinity groups to separate staff and provide ‘safe spaces’ for ‘underrepresented’ people to express themselves,” reports National Review. source

This is not inclusion. It is partition. When the practice spreads to children, the damage hardens. The euphemism is “support.” The reality is ideological sorting. Children are not merely grouped by race. They are taught to feel differently about themselves because of it. The curriculum accuses instead of educates.

The resegregation is intentional.

“More than a third of students attend schools where 75% or more of those in attendance are of a single race or ethnicity,” according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, cited by ABC News. source

This is not diversity. It is demographic sorting. Affinity groups add a second layer — moral sorting. The lesson is clear: identity is destiny, and guilt is inherited.

Chicago Public Schools has formalized the process.

“Affinity groups are spaces for people with shared identities to come together, connect, and support one another,” reads their official equity toolkit. source

The contradiction is grotesque. Schools claim to fight discrimination by institutionalizing it. They preach unity while enforcing division. They teach empathy by modeling resentment. Children feel alienated. Friendships fracture. Trust erodes.

The federal government knows.

“The U.S. Department of Education has sent a Dear Colleague Letter… notifying them that they must cease using race preferences and stereotypes… Institutions that fail to comply may… face investigation and loss of federal funding.” source

But the machinery keeps grinding. When federal law is treated as a suggestion, the system is not broken, it is complicit.

This is not a misunderstanding. It is a movement. Not a mistake. It is a mandate. The language of justice has been weaponized. The tools of education have been repurposed. The victims are children too young to understand why their skin color determines their treatment.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *